The Role Of Fascism, And Background Of Ernest Hemingway

What comes to mind about World War I when you think about it? Is it the constituent battle killing soldiers left and right or the unsanitary conditions the soldiers lived in? It’s safe to say World War I was one of the bloodiest battles of the 19th century, killing approximately 8 million soldiers in battle, and wounding a little over 21 million. Although this event is discussed widely throughout the country some don’t realize what all was involved with the war. Not only did the soldiers put their lives on the line but many individuals such as medical staff, ambulance drivers and pilots etc†¦did so, as well. Many countries were involved in world war one; throughout this essay the focus will remain on World War One, the role of fascism, and†¦show more content†¦Reading through the novel Fredrick Henry the main character of the story and also the ambulance driver was shot at and wounded by artillery fire while trying to retrieve a solider in the field. This part in the novel being similar to the incident that happened to Hemingway while doing his duties in war. Ernest Hemingway was born on July 28 1898 in Oak Park. Growing up Hemingway spent time hunting and fishing with his father and pursuing instruments such as the cello and signing in the church choir. Fast forwarding a couple years Hemingway found himself to be an exceptional scholar and athlete. After trying to run away from home twice Hemingway found his opportunity through enlisting in World War 1in 1917. Quick to get shut down because of his eye troubles he pursued a new career in being a reporter for the Kansas City Star. Soon after that Hemingway decided to take part in the Red Cross medical service, driving an ambulance around the Italian front. As his journey went on he then enlisted in Italian infantry which served on the Austrian Front. Shortly after the war ending Hemingway returned to Michigan and began writing fiction stories. Hemingway published his first book â€Å"Three stories and ten poems† in 1923. Six years later Hemingway published â€Å"A Farwell to Arms †. The novel told a story of the love between an English nurse and an American solider that quickly got ruined by the collapse of the war. Fascism is a reactionary and revolutionary

Aristotle, Immanuel Kant And Kant - 2637 Words

What does it mean to be Good? How does one define a concept as broad as Good? For every wave of philosophers the world has seen there has been at least one to every group that has tried to explain what Good is. Each person’s vision is more different than the last. A subject as large as Good will certainly have a multitude of different definitions but it is my goal to try an select which philosopher if any have actually successfully defined it. The philosophers I chose to analyze are Aristotle, Immanuel Kant and G.E. Moore and all three’s interpretations of what Good is and how does one achieve a good life. â€Å"The good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim.† To Aristotle, Good is defined by happiness and the means to which we took to achieve it. This truth is widely accepted, but the issue in this derives from what constitutes happiness. Aristotle attempts to answer this question in Nicomachean. He also does not treat happiness as merely an adjective but as something much more. Rather than living happily, it is more about doing happily. According to Aristotle, happiness is extracted through the activities we choose to do and not only must we perform these acts but we must perform them well. â€Å"With those who identify with virtue or some one virtue our account is in harmony; for to virtue belongs virtuous activity.† So the activities we choose must feed our rational souls through those virtuous acts. But this does not mean that a virtuous man will be happyShow MoreRelatedThe Aristotle And Immanuel Kant1655 Words   |  7 Pages The philosophers Aristotle and Immanuel Kant express the sources of virtuous and dutiful actions in a similar, yet different way. Both philosophers agree that an action has moral worth, when it is preformed for its own sake. However, the difference contains a more significant meaning. Aristotle believes that pleasure can be included when preforming an action; while Kant believes that a duty is preforming the right action without the need of inclinations. In this paper, I will present a similarityRead MoreThe Ethical Theories Of Aristotle And Immanuel Kant1910 Words   |  8 Pagesand contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. The moral philosophies of Kant and Aristotle are dissimilar in the rationale they suggest for moral conduct. Theorists suggest what they believe is a normative ethical approach, which should be utilized as a guide to determining moral conduct. Kant bases his opinions of morality completely on reason, while Aristotle treated the virtuous person as sensing good about being good. Kant and Aristotle share the opinion, that ordinary humanRead MoreThe Principles Of Aristotle, Bertrand Russell, And Immanuel Kant1555 Words   |  7 Pagesbeing true and false. Modern logic descends mainly from the ancient Greek tradition. All three philosophers; Aristotle, Bertrand Russell, and Immanuel Kant theorized the question of what is logic. The greatest and most influential of Platos students was Aristotle, but the works of Aristotle do reflect his teachings from Plato but unlike Plato, Aristotle was concrete and practical. Aristotle defined logic as â€Å"new and necessary reasoning†, â€Å"new† because it allows us to learn what we do not know, andRead MoreImmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle: Morals and Ethical Codes1169 Words   |  5 Pageswithout thoroughly exploring their options. Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle are philosophers that focus on the topic of ethics, yet all have different outlooks. Kant is considered a non-consequentiality, which means he feels the intentions motives, and good will is more important than the results or consequences of an action. The backbone of Kants philosophy is the belief in the fundamental freedom of the individual. Kant did not indicate anarchy, but the idea of self-governmentRead MoreSocrates Plato Aristotle and Immanuel Kant Views on Happiness Government Religion and Objectivity2508 Words   |  11 Pageshappiness, or better yet, where happiness exists is a question that has been pondered by many great thinkers. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, Plato and Socrates had quite a bit to say on the subject. All of these well-known philosophers have a road map to happiness, religion, passion and objectivity. Yet, their theories differ ultimately in how to go about attaining each of them. For both Plato and Aristotle the good appears to be happiness. For Plato, this is where his interpretation of the meaning of EudaimonismRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 Pages Philosophical analysis of Aristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethicsRead MoreKant And Aristotle s Views On Ethics And Morals1480 Words   |  6 PagesProfessor Strom Philosophy 300 Class Section 1200 Recitation-Tuesday 10am 2/11/2015 What Is The Highest Good? Immanuel Kant and Aristotle are two of the most prominent philosophers on ethics and morals. Each has their own idea about human life and what the highest good is. It has even been said that in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals Kant disproves Aristotle’s view. In order to prove that Kant successfully disproves Aristotle’s theory, we must first understand both theories. After a successfulRead MoreGrounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals And On Groveling By Immanuel Kant891 Words   |  4 PagesImmanuel Kant discusses the second and third translation pieces in â€Å"Key Selections.† In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals and On Groveling, Kant explains that humans have an animal-like nature. If Kant was charged with the statement, â€Å"Bottom line, humans are nothing more than insignificant creatures with an animal nature,† he would have a mixed response to the charge. Although Kant may not believe that neither humans or animals are insignific ant, he would recognize the relation and similaritiesRead MoreSolving Ethical Dilemmas Essay1501 Words   |  7 Pagesethical interpretations of philosophers Aristotle, Benedict de Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, and myself will be addressed regarding this particular dilemma. Aristotle sought a philosophy of happiness which would be applicable to each individual man. He believed virtue is never absolute. In other words, one rule can never apply to all men. Instead, the individual through lifes experiences must find the source which brings him the most happiness. More importantly, Aristotle reasoned that this source would neverRead MoreComparing Aristotle And John Stuart Mill1130 Words   |  5 Pagesconcentrate of the famous works of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. After meticulously analyzing each of the above philosophers’ texts, I personally prefer the position of utilitarian and Benthamite, John Stuart Mill. After comparing and contrasting the positions and reasonings of these philosophers, I will demonstrate my own reasons why I have chosen John Stuart Mill as the most established in his theory of the role of pleasure in morality. Aristotle was a particularly influential

Analysis Of The Movie Allegiant - 1566 Words

Have you ever read a book, and then watched the movie based off the book and realized that the movie was completely different from the book? This is what happened to the third movie in the Divergent series, Allegiant. This was not a complete surprise, with Insurgent, the second movie of the series, being a little off, but fans were not expecting a whole different story. Although it has an amazing cast Allegiant in the Divergent series, is frustrating for many teenagers and young adults who have read the books because the screenwriters for the movie did not follow a lot of the book’s original story. Some of the changed elements included missing characters, changed and missing scenes, relationships and points of view. Warning, there will be spoilers. Throughout the Divergent series, the readers and film watchers follow Tris as she finds out she is â€Å"divergent.† Divergent is defined as people who display an aptitude for multiple groups or cliques within the larger popu lation (GradeSaver). She has to conform to society to make it look like she is not a divergent, even though the leadership quickly realizes she is different. Allegiant is the third and final, at least in the books, part of the Divergent series. It is a continuation of a story where Tris escapes with Four, Tris’ boyfriend, to journey beyond the wall that enclosed their city of Chicago from the rest of the world. Once outside the wall, they discovered and learned new truths about the outside world. One of the things

Women and Pregnancy in Bom Jesus Essay - 1732 Words

Women and Pregnancy in Bom Jesus The women, men, and children that live in Bom Jesus, for the most part, from the moment they are born have a very hard life. The impoverished women, on average during their reproductive days, have about 12 pregnancies. Of those pregnancies only about three of the children survive. (pg. 311) When asked, how many children would be the ideal family size, the women would answer between two to three children. (pg. 331-332) So the question that must be asked is why these women have so many pregnancies when they only really want about three children? The answer to that question has many reasons and most of them are deeply rooted in the culture that the women live in. First there is the issue of birth†¦show more content†¦(pg. 231) In Brazil 1,000,000 children die a year which is about 40 children every hour and is the highest infant mortality rate. (pg. 279) Consequently the women are used to death and to cope with the loss of so many children they have become indifferent to death of their offspring. They even find it strange when someone feels sorrow for a child’s death like when Shcheper-Hughes came to a mother red eyed and tear stained with the bad news that her son had died. The mother was amused at her sadness because in the end no one thought that the child would live. (pg. 271-272) There are many reasons that the women are so indifferent to their children dying. They can barely afford to keep the â€Å"healthy† family members alive and fed so when they have a new child they have to decide which is better to keep fed: the newborn that does not know life or one that lives and has been around. They must save those who are salvageable. (pg. 405) When an infant is born the women, for the most part, cannot breast feed for many reasons. If they are employed their bosses do not want to see the women lactating while serving their families dinner thus they are afraid of getting fired. (pg. 323) There is also a cultural reason for not breast feeding in where they believe that if they do they will transfer their sins to their infants. (pg. 326) So the babies are fed powdered mild when they can afford it. But because the women and men cannot afford to buy the weekly cans of

Labor and Employment Law Free Essays

It is the law, which provide legal right, restrictions and control on the workers working at the working place in the organization. The employment law was designed to protect the interest of the workers. Almost all the countries and International Labor Organization prepared it to keep the labors in equal position with the society. We will write a custom essay sample on Labor and Employment Law or any similar topic only for you Order Now It is prepared on the different aspects of labors such as their working place, minimum wage, working time, health and safety, workplace environment etc. Labor and Employment Law, 12th Edition was wrote by the famous labor arbitrator containing chapters on pay equity and age discrimination, disability discrimination ad worker’s compensation laws ad employee privacy. The National Labor Relation Board is designed to provide right to the private sector employees to form their labor union and bargain collectively over wages, hours and working conditions. The NRLB also provide right to an employer to voluntarily recognize a union when card is presented with the sign of majority of the employees. The employer is authorized to enter into card check agreement with union before collection of signatures. It is mandatory required on the part of employer to assemble signatures from more than majority of bargaining unit employees. The third party may check the authorization cards to judge the limits of the members as provided I the NRLA act. The Board may order to an employer to bargain with union, even when the  Ã‚   union lost secret ballot election. Therefore, from the above points it is clear that card check agreement is replacing the ballot election because it is more economical, more transparent etc. because conduction of secret ballot election is more private affair and confidential and   create more pressure o the employees. I the nutshell, card check recognition may reduce earning inequality, whereas mandatory secret ballot elections may increase it. Reference: Referred to sites: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_and_employment_law/ Employment law http://www.workinglife.org/filebin/fol/CRS_may_2005_reportcardcheck.pdf/ Labor union recognition procedures: use of secret ballots and cards checks. How to cite Labor and Employment Law, Papers

The Connection Between Ernest Hemingway And Nature free essay sample

Essay, Research Paper Ignorance is bliss. True felicity lies in simpleness. We have all heard these expressions at one point or another in our lives. Apparently, the same held true for Ernest Hemingway, as he appears to hold taken them to bosom. Ernest Hemingway s perceptual experience of that which was beautiful was ever that which was simple. And what could perchance be any simpler than nature itself? It lacks the jumble and complexness of work forces and engineering ever chattering about and interrupting things. Nature is simple, violent, wild, and above all, pure. It can non be contaminated by the trickeries of adult male, for if it were, so it would discontinue being nature. That is another ground that I believe Hemingway was infatuated with it ; it can non be touched. It can non be tainted. To populate harmonizing to natural jurisprudence, this realease of the imaginativeness. In detecting truth we create beauty. We will write a custom essay sample on The Connection Between Ernest Hemingway And Nature or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As I said before, Hemingway believed that nature was the ultimate. It was simple, it was beautiful, it was clean. It was flawlessness. For Hemingway, nature was good. It epitomized all that he stood for. Topographic points with the jumble of work forces constantly led to trouble and enduring or decease. Hemingway was truly large on simpleness in his plants. Everything was simple, from his manner, to his characters ( Internet Explorer: Catherine # 8211 ; simpleton if I of all time saw one ) . I think that he likened civilisation to a elephantine machine. The larger and more complex it got, the more things it did. However, when something gets larger and more complex, so that increases the opportunities and the countries that something can interrupt down. In A Farewell to Arms Hemingway said that the universe will interrupt you. It may non be today or tomorrow, but it will interrupt you, and if it can t interrupt you, so it will kill you. In any event, the universe ever wins, because it doesn t drama reasonably. Einstein said that, Not merely does God play dice ; but the dies are loaded. Not merely reasonably words, eh? It sums up how Hemingway felt about the universe. He knew that no affair how hard you fought, the universe would ever win in the terminal. But nature was a manner out. It wouldn t save you, but it could give you a approval ( or a expletive ) depending on how you look at it. It makes it so that you do non Have to believe. Of class you carry on idea procedures, but true deep idea is bound, gagged, and tied to a chair. You didn Ts have to believe about your inevitable loss or death. You could acquire off from it all, for a short piece at least ; in kernel, running, but non concealment. Besides, something that Hemingway used nature to cover with extensively was the ever-present nil. The nil is a derivative of the motion known as existential philosophy that developed after the first universe war. Many began to believe, after witnessing the range and horror of World War I, that life genuinely had no purpse to it. Nature was, for Hemingway and for Nick ( # 8221 ; In a Big Two Hearted River # 8221 ; ) a Clean, Illuminated Place ( The rubric of another of Hemingway # 8217 ; s lesser known plants, pardon the wordplay ) . A topographic point where you could acquire off from it all, where you wouldn Ts have to Think about your life. As many philosophers have said, this universe is a rough one. You have happiness or you don # 8217 ; t, you have friends and lovers or you don # 8217 ; t, you have money or you don # 8217 ; t, and for those people who don # 8217 ; T, there must be a topographic point where they can seek a false sense of comfort, like a quiet coffeehouse i n Spain. You will detect that I said false. Yes, it feels good while you are at that place, but when you walk out the door, or travel back place, a s you necessarily must, you face the nil once more. That being said, I think that Hemingway believed that nature is a truth. Well, more of a half-truth. Nature s simpleness allows it to be closer to the truth than one might really believe. In A Farewell to Arms 1 could ever trust on nature for penetration into the secret plan. The rain was ever a large index of how things were traveling. If you look, you will see that every individual clip something inordinately bad either happened or was traveling to go on, it was raining. Some have argued that rain is non a bad symbol in this book. I disagree. Rain was ever making something destructive in AFTA, either strike harding the foliages off of trees or making mud gangrenes for people who had to walk outside, or it was floging at people s faces. Besides, think realistically for a 2nd. Who likes being outside during a storm. I don t. Who would bask holding rain rain you and biting your face all the clip? And who could bury the chiropteran that paid Frederick and Catherine a visit? A chiropteran winging into thier room was surely non a good portents in any sense. Bats have been forerunners of day of reckoning in many civilizations, and I think that that peculiar component was incorporated into this narrative. Of class, nature is non limited to being a history of a decease foretold. It is something that one can touch. In A Farewell to Arms Hemingway attacked the ideals of award, heroism, trueness, and other like-minded things. These things, Hemingway argued, were nil. Honor is incapable of feeding your kids. Loyalty will non maintain your married woman warm while she waits in bed for you, fearing for your life every dark that you are contending the war. Hemingway put small stock in such things. Have you of all time seen a ball of heroism, or a spot of selflessness? No. His point was that if you stacked those things on a graduated table with the organic structures of all who had been killed in the war, it wouldn t even make a bloody dent in the tipping of the graduated tables. Nature, on the other manus, could be grasped and seen and tasted and felt. Nature was something TANGIBLE. It was existent. It was the stone that Hemingway could sit on and it was an ground tackle for Nick s psyche in A Big Two-Hearted River. Possibly that was why it was a clean illuminated topographic point for Hemingway. Work forces have ever strived for calling things. Labeling them so that they think they have control of things. However, I think that this is merely a screen for things that they don t want to see. Someone one time said, In detecting the truth, we create beauty. I explained one reading of that line. However, I think that there is a dual significance to it. It deals with the Nothing. When we realize what it is, we create beauty so that we don t have to see what s genuinely at that place. Nature is alot. Alot of something. But can t somthing besides be nil? I think so. When one genuinely thinks about it, certain nature is pullulating with life, but what is it beyond that. Wide unfastened infinites. Vast, empty countries. It s a whole batch of nil. Nature is so peaceable because you are so near to the Nothing when you immerse yourself in it. I think that adult male is unable to get by with that, and so we have labelled nature to be beautiful. We call it a clean illuminated topographic p oint, that last barrier against the nil. It s non our best defence against it, you understand. It is simply the concluding 1. In many books ( Heart of Darkness, for illustration ) what was genuinely found at the bosom of nature? Nothing. Sometimes the best topographic point to conceal is right out in the unfastened.

A Letter Of Advice †Myassignmenthelp.com

Questions: (1). Draft a letter of advice to Bruce informing him about whether or not he can sponsor his wife Thelma to Australia. Refer to the relevant legislation and policy in your letter. (Do not include information about the requirements for a partner visa. Refer only to the sponsorship issue). (2). On behalf of Ronny, draft submissions to the case officer addressing the relevant criteria that have to be satisfied because of his status as an unlawful non-citizen. Answers: (1). Dear Bruce, First of all, thank you for sharing with me .I am sorry to hear about the problems that you are facing. Nevertheless am glad you are finally happy with your current partner and you are looking forward to settling with her soon. I am writing in response to your inquiry whether can apply to sponsor your Thelma as your third wife. After examining your case closely I found out that you qualify for sponsorship under the Immigration Laws of Australia. In this letter, I will refer to several issues that will make you understand the relevant legislations and policies enacted in the Migration Act that will allow your genuine request. Mr. Bruce you are a permanent residence and that makes you eligible to sponsor a fianc or a partner. You meet all the requirements necessary to sponsor a partner to Australia. The limiting provisions likely to be imposed to your default qualifications are not applicable. Though you have previously sponsored two other person(s) as fiancs to Australia, it can be argued out because your former wife died .The Act would have limited you in this case if your former wife obtained a permanent residence on grounds of family violence, if you withdrew from the relationship. Second, the provision would limit you if you have sponsored another fianc within the last five years. It long enough since you had sponsored Rebekka and Georgia to Australia Therefore you are eligible to sponsor you current partner. You can also in a position to sponsor your current wife because your previous wife Rebekka died and the Act acknowledges that. However you will be required to provide Rebekkas death certificate. Now that your relationship with Thelma is doing well and you are looking forward to settling down and having a family, the act recognizes your commitment and seriousness in the relationship and will offer you a chance to sponsor your wife irrespective of your previous sponsorships. The other good thing is that you are expecting a child and soon you will be a father. The Act will be compelled to withdraw its limitations and accept your application to sponsor owing to the fact that your wife Thelma is expecting a child and therefore, you will be allowed to sponsor her to Australia. Yours Sincerely, Migration Agent (2). Ronny has been an unlawful non-citizen for a period of four year. He was disowned by his father for being gay. For the past three year he has been in a committed relationship with Steve. The following draft contains submissions that qualify Ronny as unlawful non-citizen to lodge a partner visa and be sponsored to Australia. Ronny became unlawful Australia citizen for reasons behold his control. Ronny together with his family come to Australia on a temporary work visas. At the time Ronny was only 17 years of age. When Ronny identified himself as gay, his father disowned him and he started living on his own. His parent work visas expired after four years and they returned to their home country, Canada. It is clear that Ronny was faced with conditions behold his control that led to inconveniences to apply for another substantive visa. Secondly, there are compelling reasons for granting Ronny a visa. Ronny is in a long standing relationship with his boyfriend Steve. Both have been living together for the past three years and the relationship is genuine. Steve is a permanent Australian citizen who is eligible for sponsoring a partner to Australia. Also, it can be considered that Ronny was separated from his family and it was difficult for him to apply for a substantive visa. On other account Ronny complied substantially with all conditions attached to his previous visas. Ronny has no criminal case reported to the respective authorities during his stay. This shows that he complied with the conditions stipulated in his substantive visa. Mr. Ronny is intending to comply with all conditions that will be placed on the visa. Ronny is convinced and willing to cooperate following his partners illness. Steve, Ronnys partner has been diagnosed with bone cancer and requires a surgery to treat it .During this period, he really requires his partner to be around since he will be off work and limited on what to do at home. Steve who is up to sponsoring Ronny is an eligible person. He meets all provision and requirements to sponsor a fianc or partner under Migration Act. Also he is not limited to sponsor a partner because under any legislation and policies of Department of Immigration and boarder protection (DIBP). Steve has neither sponsored two partners in the past to be Australians nor has he sponsored anyone for the past five years. Ronnys relationship with Steve is genuine. They have a mutual commitment that involves shared life as husband and wife. They are in an open relationship and Steve feels he cannot endure the painful situation alone and needs Ronny by his side. Ronny meets health and character requirements needed for a partner visa. Ronny has no records of criminal offenses and health complications. To the time of lodging a partner visa, Ronny and Steve live under the same roof. They have been living together for the past three years. They have lived together long enough and it evident that they share social commitment. Steve and Ronny are not family. Ronny is from Canada while Steve is from Australia. They are from different countries and the only bond keeping them together is a marriage relationship. It is behold reasonable doubt that Ronny and Steve are not related by blood or marriage. They met independently and created a relationship that has resulted to them being family. In Conclusion, I am satisfied that Ronny though he is an unlawful non-citizen in Australia, has met all the requirements requirements and fulfilled all criteria of proceeding with partner visa application. This is after establishing that Ronny became unlawful non-citizen for reasons behold his control and assessing that they have been living together with his partner and do have shared pecuniary and other social commitments. References: Crock, M. E., Berg, L. (2011). Immigration, refugees and forced migration: Law, policy and practice in Australia. Annandale, N.S.W: Federation Press. Cope, A., Migration Institute of Australia., FCG Legal., Victoria University (Melbourne, Vic.). (2010). Australian immigration companion: Practical problems and solutions with an introduction to migration law and visa application procedures. Sydney, NSW: Migration Institute of Australia. Vrachnas, J. (2006). Migration and refugee law in Australia: Commentary and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Dickie, M. (2015). Introduction to Australian migration law and practice. Ozdowski, S. A., Clearing House on Migration Issues (Australia). (1984). The Australian migration law: A time for change?. Richmond: Clearing House on Migration Issues Goddard, J., Immigration Advice and Rights Centre (Sydney, N.S.W.). (1997). Immigration kit: A practical guide to Australia's immigration law. Leichhardt, N.S.W: Federation Press. Dauvergne, C. (2005). Humanitarianism, identity, and nation: Migration laws of Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press. Crawford, D., University of New South Wales. (2004). Australian immigration law and practice, a practical course in knowledge of migration law procedure: Temporary visas. Kensington, N.S.W.: University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law, Continuing Legal Education.